I have been hesitant about eBooks because of
- DRM issues
- How would I choose among the various readers out there?
However, the sheer volume of our library means the issue is always coming up. Also, I find that I am collecting a large number of pdf files, for which the DRM problem does not come up. An eBook reader would be nice just for them.
That leaves the issue of choosing a reader. The iPad is out: It costs too much. So the announcement of Amazon’s latest Kindle led me to do a comparison about what eBooks they offer as opposed to what can be bought from Barnes and Noble for their Nook. Forget about New York Times best sellers; I have some rather odd interests and I wanted to find out which bookseller had the most eBooks that would interest me. So on each of their web sites I entered various keywords and phrases and noted the number of hits:
| Search Term | Amazon | Barnes & Noble |
|---|---|---|
| Anglican | 208 | 250 |
| Gaelic | 51 | 82 |
| hieroglyphics | 31 | 27 |
| Hittite | 9 | 15 |
| linguistics | 4431 | 383 |
| Minoan | 11 | 1 |
| Mycenaean | 4 | 0 |
| Old Irish | 441 | 226 |
| quantum mechanics | 342 | 3 |
| relativity | 303 | 16 |
| theology | 7408 | 3200 |
| topology | 351 | 6 |
| woodworking | 225 | 12 |
Actually, the results are even more one-sided than the statistics show. B&N included a lot of free books from Google. Amazon did not, but since they are pdf’s the Kindle can certainly handle them.